[Update] รายชื่อภาพยนตร์ที่ทำเงินสูงสุด wiki | กัปตันอเมริกา คริสโตเฟอร์ จอร์จ ซาร์ริส – Australia.xemloibaihat

กัปตันอเมริกา คริสโตเฟอร์ จอร์จ ซาร์ริส: นี่คือโพสต์ที่เกี่ยวข้องกับหัวข้อนี้

1. ↑Krämer, Peter (1999). “Women First: Titanic, Action-Aventure Films, and Hollywood’s Female Audience”. ใน Sandler, Kevin S.; Studlar, Gaylyn (บ.ก.). .

   Rutgers University Press

   . pp. 108–131. ISBN 978-0-8135-2669-0. p. 130: The list has at number one with $913 million, followed by …

2. ↑Monaco, James (2009). .

   Oxford University Press

   . p. 262. ISBN 978-0-19-975579-0. The Birth of a Nation, costing an unprecedented and, many believed, thoroughly foolhardy $110,000, eventually returned $20 million and more. The actual figure is hard to calculate because the film was distributed on a “states’ rights” basis in which licenses to show the film were sold outright. The actual cash generated by The Birth of a Nation may have been as much as $50 million to $100 million, an almost inconceivable amount for such an early film.

3. 83.0 83.1Wasko, Janet (1986). “D.W. Griffiths and the banks: a case study in film financing”. ใน Kerr, Paul (บ.ก.). .

   Routledge

   . p. 34. ISBN 978-0-7100-9730-9. Various accounts have cited $15 to $18 million profits during the first few years of release, while in a letter to a potential investor in the proposed sound version, Aitken noted that a $15 to $18 million box-office gross was a ‘conservative estimate’. For years has listed

   ‘

   s total rental at $50 million. (This reflects the total amount paid to the distributor, not box-office gross.) This ‘trade legend’ has finally been acknowledged by as a ‘whopper myth’, and the amount has been revised to $5 million. That figure seems far more feasible, as reports of earnings in the Griffith collection list gross receipts for 1915–1919 at slightly more than $5.2 million (including foreign distribution) and total earnings after deducting general office expenses, but not royalties, at about $2 million.

4. ↑Birchard, Robert S. (2010), , p. 45, Intolerance was the most expensive American film made up until that point, costing a total of $489,653, and its performance at the box … but it did recoup its cost and end with respectable overall numbers.

   In:

   In: Block & Wilson 2010

5. ↑Coons, Robin (June 30, 1939). “Hollywood Chatter”. . p. 6.

6. ↑Shipman, David (1970). .

   Crown Publishing Group

   . p. 98. It was a low budgeter—$120,000—but it grossed world-wide over $3 million and made stars of Chaney and his fellow-players, Betty Compson and Thomas Meighan.

7. 90.0 90.1Solomon, Aubrey (2011). .

   McFarland & Company

   . ISBN 978-0-7864-6286-5.

   • : p. 52. “D.W. Griffith’s (1920) was projected to return rentals of $4,000,000 on an $800,000 negative. This figure was based on the amounts earned from its roadshow run, coupled with its playoff in the rest of the country’s theaters. Griffith had originally placed the potential film rental at $3,000,000 but, because of the success of the various roadshows that were running the $4,000,000 total was expected. The film showed a profit of $615,736 after just 23 weeks of release on a gross of $2,179,613.”
   • : p. 112. “What Price Glory hit the jackpot with massive world rentals of $2,429,000, the highest figure in the history of the company. Since it was also the most expensive production of the year at $817,000 the profit was still a healthy $796,000…”
   • : p. 170. “The actual cost of was $1,116,000 and it was most definitely not guaranteed a success. In fact, if its foreign grosses followed the usual 40 percent of domestic returns, the film would have lost money. In a turnaround, the foreign gross was almost double the $1,000,000 domestic take to reach total world rentals of $3,000,000 and Fox’s largest profit of the year at $664,000.”
   • : p. 170. ” did turn out to be a substantial hit with the help of Janet Gaynor boosting Will Rogers back to the level of money-making star. Its prestige engagements helped raked in a total $1,208,000 in domestic rentals. Surprisingly, in foreign countries unfamiliar with state fairs, it still earned a respectable $429,000. With its total rentals, the film ended up showing a $398,000 profit.”

8. ↑ was to become Metro’s most expensive production and one of the decade’s biggest box-office hits. Its production costs have been estimated at “something between $600,000 and $800,000.” estimated its worldwide gross at $4 million in 1925 and at $5 million in 1944; in 1991, it estimated its cumulative domestic rentals at $3,800,000.”Hall & Neale 2010 , p. 53 . “was to become Metro’s most expensive production and one of the decade’s biggest box-office hits. Its production costs have been estimated at “something between $600,000 and $800,000.”estimated its worldwide gross at $4 million in 1925 and at $5 million in 1944; in 1991, it estimated its cumulative domestic rentals at $3,800,000.”
9. ↑Brownlow, Kevin (1968). .

   University of California Press

   . p. 255. ISBN 978-0-520-03068-8. The negative cost was about $986,000, which did not include Fairbanks’ own salary. Once the exploitation and release prints were taken into account, cost about $1,400,000—exceeding both ($700,000) and the celebrated “million dollar movie” . But it earned $2,500,000.

10. ↑Vance, Jeffrey (2008). .

    University of California Press

    . p. 146. ISBN 978-0-520-25667-5. The film had a production cost of $930,042.78—more than the cost of D.W. Griffith’s and nearly as much as Erich von Stroheim’s (1922).

11. ↑May, Richard P. (Fall 2005), “Restoring The Big Parade”, , 5 (2): 140–146, doi:10.1353/mov.2005.0033, ISSN 1532-3978, S2CID 192076406, …earning somewhere between $18 and $22 million, depending on the figures consulted

12. ↑Robertson, Patrick (1991). (4 ed.).

    Abbeville Publishing Group

    . p. 30. ISBN 978-1-55859-236-0. The top grossing silent film was King Vidor’s (US 25), with worldwide rentals of $22 million.

13. ↑Hall & Neale 2010 , pp. 58–59 . “Even then, at a time when the budget for a feature averaged at around $300,000, no more than $382,000 was spent on production…According to the Eddie Mannix Ledger at MGM, it grossed $4,990,000 domestically and $1,141,000 abroad.”
14. ↑, which opened at the end of 1925, had out-grossed all the other pictures released by the company in 1926 combined. With worldwide rentals of $9,386,000 on first release it was, with the sole possible exception of , the highest-earning film of the entire silent era. (At a negative cost of $3,967,000, it was also the most expensive.)”Hall & Neale 2010 , p. 163 . “MGM’s silent, which opened at the end of 1925, had out-grossed all the other pictures released by the company in 1926 combined. With worldwide rentals of $9,386,000 on first release it was, with the sole possible exception of, the highest-earning film of the entire silent era. (At a negative cost of $3,967,000, it was also the most expensive.)”
15. ↑ was the studio’s most expensive movie of the decade, and though it did well it was not good enough to earn a profit.”Finler 2003 , p. 188 . “At a cost of $2 millionwas the studio’s most expensive movie of the decade, and though it did well it was not good enough to earn a profit.”
16. 103.0 103.1 and
    • Block, Hayley Taylor (2010), , p. 113, The film brought in $2.6 million in worldwide rentals and made a net profit of $1,196,750. Jolson’s follow-up Warner Bros. film, (1928), brought in over two times as much, with $5.9 in worldwide rentals and a profit of $3,649,000, making them two of the most profitable films in the 1920s.

      In: Block & Wilson 2010.

    and

17. ↑Crafton, Donald (1999). .

    University of California Press

    . pp. 549–552. ISBN 978-0-520-22128-4. : Negative Cost ($1000s): 388

18. ↑Birchard, Robert S. (2010), , p. 121, It earned $4.4 million in worldwide rentals and was the first movie to spawn sequels (there were several until 1940).

    In:

    In: Block & Wilson 2010

19. ↑Bradley, Edwin M. (2004) [1st. pub. 1996]. .

    McFarland & Company

    . ISBN 978-0-7864-2029-2.

    • : p. 12. “Ego aside, Jolson was at the top of his powers in . The $150,000 Warner Bros. paid him to make it, and the $388,000 it took to produce the film, were drops in the hat next to the film’s world gross of $5.9 million. Its $3.8-million gross in this country set a box-office record that would not be surpassed until Walt Disney’s (1937).”
    • : p. 24. ” with a negative cost of $379,000, grossed $2.8 million in the United States, $4.8 million worldwide, and made a recorded profit of $1.6 million for MGM.”
    • : p. 58. “It grossed an impressive $2.5 million domestically and nearly $4 million worldwide.”

20. 107.0 107.1 107.2Solomon, Aubrey (2002) [First published 1988]. . Filmmakers series. 20.

    Rowman & Littlefield

    . ISBN 978-0-8108-4244-1.

    • : p. 10. “, a musical starring Janet Gaynor and Charles Farrell, showed domestic rentals of $3.5 million, a record for the company.”
    • : p. 66. “On the surface, with world rentals of $8 million, was considered a hit at distribution level.”

    p. 167. “The motion pictures were all moneymakers and Zanuck’s record would have immediately improved had he stayed through the release of , which took in rentals of approximately $75 million worldwide.”

    p. 256. “$3,300,00”.

21. ↑Cormack, Mike (1993). .

    Palgrave Macmillan

    . p. 28. ISBN 978-0-312-10067-4. Although costing $1250000—a huge sum for any studio in 1929—the film was a financial success. Karl Thiede gives the domestic box-office at $1500000, and the same figure for the foreign gross.

22. 110.0 110.1Balio, Tino (1996). . Volume 5 of History of the American Cinema.

    University of California Press

    . ISBN 978-0-520-20334-1.

    • : p. 182. “Produced by Winfield Sheehan at a cost of $1.25 million, won Academy Awards for best picture, director, art direction and grossed close to $4 million during its first release, much of which came from Great Britain and the Empire.”
    • : p. 212. “Produced by Sam Goldwyn at a cost of $1 million, the picture was an adaptation of a smash musical comedy built around Eddie Cantor…A personality-centered musical, made little attempt to integrate the comedy routines, songs, and story. Nonetheless, Cantor’s feature-film debut grossed over $2.6 million worldwide and started a popular series that included (1931), (1932), and (1933).”

23. ↑
    • Balio, Tino (1976). .

      University of Wisconsin Press

      . p. 110. Hughes did not have the “Midas touch” the trade press so often attributed to him. , for example, reported that cost $3.2 million to make, and by July, 1931, eight months after its release, the production cost had nearly been paid off. Keats claimed the picture cost $4 million to make and that it earned twice that much within twenty years. The production cost estimate is probably correct. Hughes worked on the picture for over two years, shooting it first as a silent and then as a talkie. Lewis Milestone said that in between Hughes experimented with shooting it in color as well. But

      ‘

      s earnings report must be the fabrication of a delirious publicity agent, and Keats’ the working of a myth maker. During the seven years it was in United Artists distribution, grossed $1.6 million in the domestic market, of which Hughes’ share was $1.2 million. Whatever the foreign gross was, it seems unlikely that it was great enough to earn a profit for the picture.

24. ↑, which had opened in February 1931.”Block & Wilson 2010 , p. 163 . “It drew $1.4 million in worldwide rentals in its first run versus $1.2 million for, which had opened in February 1931.”
25. ↑Vance, Jeffrey (2003). .

    Abrams Books

    . p. 208. Chaplin’s negative cost for City Lights was $1,607,351. The film eventually earned him a worldwide profit of $5 million ($2 million domestically and $3 million in foreign distribution), an enormous sum of money for the time.

26. ↑Ramsaye, Terry, บ.ก. (1937). “The All-Time Best Sellers – Motion Pictures”. : 942–943. : $2,621,000 (data supplied by Eddie Cantor)

27. 116.0 116.1 116.2 116.3Sedgwick, John (2000). .

    University of Exeter Press

    . pp. 146–148. ISBN 978-0-85989-660-3. Sources: Eddie Mannix Ledger, made available to the author by Mark Glancy…

    • : Production Cost $000s: 700; Distribution Cost $000s: 947; U.S. box-office $000s: 1,235; Foreign box-office $000s: 1,359; Total box-office $000s: 2,594; Profit $000s: 947.
    • : Production Cost $000s: 1,605; Distribution Cost $000s: 1,116; U.S. box-office $000s: 861; Foreign box-office $000s: 1,747; Total box-office $000s: 2,608; Profit $000s: -113.
    • : Production Cost $000s: 1,022; Distribution Cost $000s: 766; U.S. box-office $000s: 941; Foreign box-office $000s: 934; Total box-office $000s: 1,875; Profit $000s: 87.
    • : Production Cost $000s: 1,905; Distribution Cost $000s: 1,646; U.S. box-office $000s: 2,250; Foreign box-office $000s: 2,210; Total box-office $000s: 4,460; Profit $000s: 909.
    • : Production Cost $000s: 1,300; Distribution Cost $000s: 1,736; U.S. box-office $000s: 2,868; Foreign box-office $000s: 2,405; Total box-office $000s: 5,273; Profit $000s: 2,237.

28. ↑
    • Block & Wilson 2010, p. 165. ” was Dietrich’s biggest hit in America, bringing in $1.5 million in worldwide rentals.”

29. ↑
    • Jewel, Richard (1994). “RKO Film Grosses: 1931–1951”. . 14 (1): 39. 1933 release: $1,856,000; 1938 release: $306,000; 1944 release: $685,000

    • “King Kong (1933) – Notes”.

      Turner Classic Movies

      . 1952 release: $2,500,000; budget: $672,254.75

30. ↑“I’m No Angel (1933) – Notes”.

    Turner Classic Movies

    . According to a modern source, it had a gross earning of $2,250,000 on the North American continent, with over a million more earned internationally.

31. ↑ and , written by and starring Mae West. Produced at a rock-bottom cost of $200,000 each, they undoubtedly helped Paramount through the worst patch in its history…”Finler 2003 , p. 188 . “The studio released its most profitable pictures of the decade in 1933,and, written by and starring Mae West. Produced at a rock-bottom cost of $200,000 each, they undoubtedly helped Paramount through the worst patch in its history…”
32. ↑Block, Alex Ben (2010), , p. 173, The worldwide rentals of over $3 million keep the lights on at Paramount, which did not shy away from selling the movie’s sex appeal.

    In:

    In: Block & Wilson 2010

33. ↑Phillips, Kendall R. (2008). .

    ABC-CLIO

    . p. 26. ISBN 978-1-56720-724-8. The reaction to West’s first major film, however, was not exclusively negative. Made for a mere $200,000, the film would rake in a healthy $2 million in the United States and an additional million in overseas markets.

34. 124.0 124.1Turk, Edward Baron (2000) [1st. pub. 1998]. .

    University of California Press

    . ISBN 978-0-520-22253-3.

    • : p. 361 Cost: $1,605,000. Earnings: domestic $861,000; foreign $1,747,000; total $2,608,000. Loss: $113,000.
    • : p. 364 Cost: $1,300,000. Earnings: domestic $2,868,000; foreign $2,405,000; total $5,273,000. Profit: $2,237,000. [Reissues in 1938–39 and 1948–49 brought profits of $124,000 and $647,000 respectively.]

35. ↑McBride, Joseph (2011). .

    University Press of Mississippi

    . p. 309. ISBN 978-1-60473-838-4. According to the studio’s books brought in $1 million in film rentals during its initial release, but as Joe Walker pointed out, the figure would have been much larger if the film had not been sold to theaters on a block-booking basis in a package with more than two dozen lesser Columbia films, and the total rentals of the package spread among them all, as was customary in that era, since it minimized the risk and allowed the major studios to dominate the marketplace.

36. ↑Dick, Bernard F. (2008). .

    University Press of Mississippi

    . p. 79. ISBN 978-1-60473-087-6. Although Columbia’s president, Harry Cohn, had strong reservations about , he also knew that it would not bankrupt the studio; the rights were only $5,000, and the budget was set at $325,000, including the performers’ salaries.

37. 128.0 128.1 and
    • Block & Wilson 2010

    p. 207. “When the budget rose from $250,000 to $1,488,423 he even mortgaged his own home and automobile. Disney had bet more than his company on the success of .”

    p. 237. “By the end of 1938, it had grossed more than $8 million in worldwide rentals and was ranked at the time as the second-highest-grossing film after the 1925 epic “.

    p. 255. “On its initial release brought in only $1.6 million in domestic rentals (compared with

    ‘

    s $4.2 million) and $1.9 million in foreign rentals (compared with

    ‘

    s $4.3 million).”

    and

38. ↑ () has been variously reported between $3.9 million and $4.25 million.”Hall & Neale 2010 , p. 283 .”The final negative cost of) has been variously reported between $3.9 million and $4.25 million.”
39. ↑Barrier, Michael (2003). . New York:

    Oxford University Press

    . p. 266. ISBN 978-0-19-983922-3. The film’s negative cost was $2.6 million, more than $1 million higher than

    ‘

    s.

40. ↑Schatz, Thomas (1999) [1st. pub. 1997]. . Volume 6 of History of the American Cinema.

    University of California Press

    . p. 466. ISBN 978-0-520-22130-7. ($4.6 million).

41. ↑ was the biggest moneymaker of 1940 and one of the top films of the decade.”Block & Wilson 2010 , pp. 258 259 . “Production Cost: $2.1 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s) …was the biggest moneymaker of 1940 and one of the top films of the decade.”
42. ↑ (1941), which cost $1.6 million but was the studio’s biggest hit of the decade aside from (1943), the Irving Berlin musical for which the profits were donated to the Army Emergency Relief fund.”Finler 2003 , p. 301 . “The studio did particularly well with its war-related pictures, such as(1941), which cost $1.6 million but was the studio’s biggest hit of the decade aside from(1943), the Irving Berlin musical for which the profits were donated to the Army Emergency Relief fund.”
43. ↑Glancy, Mark (1999). .

    Manchester University Press

    . pp. 94–95. ISBN 978-0-7190-4853-1. was a phenomenon. It was the most popular film of the year (from any studio) in both North America and Britain, and its foreign earnings were three times higher than those of any other MGM film released in the 1941–42 season. The production cost ($1,344,000) was one of the highest of the season, indicating the studio never thought of the film as a potential loss-maker. When the film earned a worldwide gross of $8,878,000, MGM had the highest profit ($4,831,000) in its history. nearly matched the success of with worldwide earnings of $8,147,000 yielding the second-highest profit in MGM’s history ($4,384,000). was also the most popular film of the year in Britain, where it proved to be even more popular than Britain’s most acclaimed war film, .

44. ↑Block & Wilson 2010
    • : Burns, Douglas (2010), , p. 279,

      ‘

      s galvanizing effect on Americans spawned a record-breaking ten-week run at Radio City Music Hall and garnered a $5.4 million take in domestic rentals (making 1942’s top grosser), with a $4.8 million profit on worldwide rentals of $8.9 million.

    • : p. 275. “It became the second biggest box-office hit of 1942 (after Mrs. Miniver) and was praised by critics, making a profit of $3.4 million on worldwide rentals of $6.5 million.”

45. ↑McAdams, Frank (2010), , p. 287, Despite the early furor over the novel being “pro-red and immoral,” the film opened to strong and favorable reviews and brought in $11 million in worldwide rentals in its initial release.

    In:

    In: Block & Wilson 2010

46. 149.0 149.1“A Guy Named Joe (1944) – Notes”.

    Turner Classic Movies

    . According to M-G-M studio records at the AMPAS Library, the film had a negative cost of $2,627,000 and took in $5,363,000 at the box office. When the picture was re-issued for the 1955–56 season, it took in an additional $150,000.

47. ↑Schaefer, Eric (1999). .

    Duke University Press

    . pp. 197–199. ISBN 978-0-8223-2374-7. Leading the pack of postwar sex hygiene films was (1944), which would become not only the most successful sex hygiene film in history but the biggest pre-1960 exploitation film of any kind. At the end of 1947, the reported that had grossed $2 million. By 1949 had estimated that had taken in $8 million from twenty million moviegoers. And publicity issuing from

    ‘

    s production company indicated that by the end of 1956 it had grossed over $80 million worldwide. Net rentals of around $22 million by 1956 would easily place it in the top ten films of the late 1940s and early 1950s had it appeared on conventional lists. Some estimates have placed its total gross over the years at up to $100 million, and it was still playing drive-in dates into 1975…The film was made for around $65,000 with a crew of Hollywood veterans including director William “One Shot” Beaudine, cinematographer Marcel LePicard, and a cast that sported old stalwarts Hardie Albright, Francis Ford, and John Hamilton.

48. ↑Block & Wilson 2010
    • p. 296. “Production Cost: $1.6 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)”
    • Wasson, Sam (2010), , p. 297, This was that rare sequel that did even better at the box office than the original, bringing in a $3.7 million profit on $11.2 million in worldwide rentals.

49. ↑Gabler, Neal (2007). .

    Aurum Press

    . pp. 438. Still, the film wound up grossing $3.3 million…

50. ↑Hall & Neale 2010
    • p. 132.” was considerably cheaper, costing only $2.1 million, and therefore vastly more profitable.”
    • p. 286 (note 6.70). “Worldwide rentals for amounted to $14,750,000.”

51. ↑Burns, Douglas (2010), , p. 301, The film made a $5 million profit on worldwide rentals of $14.8 million.

    In:

    In: Block & Wilson 2010

52. 162.0 162.1 has been reported as both $5,255,000 (Haver, , 361) and $6,480,000 (Thomson, , 472); the latter figure may include distribution expenses. cost $6,375,000 (Solomon, , 243).”Hall & Neale 2010 , p. 285 (note 6.56). “The cost ofhas been reported as both $5,255,000 (Haver,, 361) and $6,480,000 (Thomson,, 472); the latter figure may include distribution expenses.cost $6,375,000 (Solomon,, 243).”
53. ↑Chopra-Gant, Mike (2006). .

    I.B. Tauris

    . p. 18. ISBN 978-1-85043-815-1. : $8 million; : $7.5 million; : $6.25 million

54. ↑Street, Sarah (2002). .

    Continuum International Publishing Group

    . p. 110. ISBN 978-0-8264-1395-6. Although both films had higher than average budgets ( cost £505,581 and cost £572,530, while the average cost of the other thirty films for which Rank supplied information was £233,000), they resulted in high takings at home and abroad.

55. ↑“

    ‘

    Snake Pit’ Seen No Problem After All”. . January 19, 1949. p. 7.

56. 170.0 170.1
    • : “…the film became the highest grosser in the studio’s history to date, with domestic rentals of $7,976,730 by 1955 and a further $6,232,520 overseas…For all their spectacle, and were quite economically produced, costing $3,097,563 and $2,170,000 respectively.”
    • : “Production costs totaled a record $7,623,000…Worldwide rentals totaled $21,037,000, almost half of which came from the foreign market.”

    Hall & Neale 2010 , p. 136 –139

57. ↑“Cinderella (1950)”. . Nash Information Services .

58. ↑Barrier, Michael (2003). .

    Oxford University Press

    . p. 401. ISBN 978-0-19-516729-0. It cost around $2.2 million, little more than each of the two package features, Melody Time and The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad (as Tluo Fabulous Characters had ultimately been named), that just preceded it, but its gross rentals—an amount shared by Disney and RKO—were $7.8 million, almost twice as much as the two package features combined.

59. ↑

    . Margaret Herrick Library,

    Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences

    : Howard Strickling Collection. 1962.

60. 175.0 175.1Lev, Peter (2006). . Volume 7 of History of the American Cinema.

    University of California Press

    . ISBN 978-0-520-24966-0.

    • : p. 15. “MGM’s most expensive film of the period, (1951) also did extremely well. The cost was $7,623,000, earnings were an estimated $21.2 million (with foreign earnings almost 50 percent of this total), and profit was estimated at $5,562,000.”
    • : pp. 203–204. “Rear Window (1954) was an excellent commercial success, with a cost of $1 million and North American rentals of $5.3 million.”

61. ↑Mulligan, Hugh A. (September 23, 1956). “Cinerama Pushing Ahead As Biggest Money-Maker”. . Eugene, Oregon. p. 7B.

62. ↑Zone, Ray (2012). .

    University Press of Kentucky

    . p. 71. ISBN 978-0-8131-3611-0. Produced at a cost of $1 million, ran 122 weeks, earning $4.7 million in its initial New York run alone and eventually grossed over $32 million. It was obvious to Hollywood that the public was ready for a new form of motion picture entertainment. The first five Cinerama feature-length travelogues, though they only played in twenty-two theaters, pulled in a combined gross of $82 million.

63. ↑Burns, Douglas (2010), , pp. 354–355, By May 1953, was reporting that the Best Picture winner had amassed $18.35 million in worldwide rentals.

    In:

    In: Block & Wilson 2010

64. ↑ in

    ‘

    s annually updated chart.”Hall & Neale 2010 , p. 147 148 . “To take full advantage of CinemaScope’s panoramic possibilities, shooting was delayed for the sets to be redesigned and rebuilt, adding $500,000 to the eventual $4.1 million budget…It ultimately returned domestic rentals of $17.5 million and $25 million worldwide, placing it second only toins annually updated chart.”

65. ↑ (1954), which named the top grosser of its year with anticipated domestic rentals of $12 million.”Hall & Neale 2010 , p. 149 . “VistaVision was first used for the musical(1954), whichnamed the top grosser of its year with anticipated domestic rentals of $12 million.”
66. ↑, based on the book by Jules Verne, starring James Mason and Kirk Douglas and directed by Richard Fleischer at a cost of $4.5 million.”Finler 2003 , p. 320 . “It was up and running in time to handle Disney’s most elaborate expensive feature,, based on the book by Jules Verne, starring James Mason and Kirk Douglas and directed by Richard Fleischer at a cost of $4.5 million.”
67. 192.0 192.1 192.2

    D’Alessandro, Anthony (October 27, 2003). “Disney Animated Features at the Worldwide Box Office”. . The Jungle Book $378 million; One Hundred and One Dalmatians $303 million; Lady and the Tramp $187 million

68. ↑Minego, Pete (May 21, 1956). “Pete’s Pungent Patter”. . Portsmouth, Ohio. p. 19.

69. ↑Block & Wilson 2010
    • p. 382. “Production Cost: $2.4 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)”
    • Burns, Douglas (2010), , p. 383, sailed onto movie screens buoyed by enthusiastic reviews and receptive audiences. For pr, Fonda, Cagney, and lemmon reenacted several scenes on ed sullivan’s popular television variety show. It returned a net profit of $4.5 million on worldwide rentals of $9.9 million, putting it in the top 5 domestic films of 1955.

70. 198.0 198.1
    • : “No film did more to entrench roadshow policy than . While the success of , , and even could be attributed, at least in part, to their respective photographic and projection formats, that of DeMille’s film (which cost a record $13,266,491) could not…General release began at normal prices in 1959 and continued until the end of the following year, when the film was temporarily withdrawn (the first of several reissues came in 1966). The worldwide rental by this time was around $60 million. In the domestic market it dislodged from the number one position on Variety’s list of All-Time Rentals Champs. had hitherto maintained its lead through several reissues (and was soon to regain it through another in 1961).”
    • : Columbia’s Anglo-American war film (1957) opened on a roadshow basis in selected U.S. cities (including New York, Chicago, Boston, and Los Angeles) and in London. Costing only $2,840,000 to produce, it grossed $30.6 million worldwide on first release.”

    Hall & Neale 2010 , pp. 159 –161

71. ↑ also became for a time the most successful film ever released in the United Kingdom, where it earned a box-office gross three times its negative cost of $5,610,000. Anticipated global rentals after three years were $30 million.”Hall & Neale 2010 , p. 153 . “also became for a time the most successful film ever released in the United Kingdom, where it earned a box-office gross three times its negative cost of $5,610,000. Anticipated global rentals after three years were $30 million.”
72. ↑Ross, Steven J. (2011). .

    Oxford University Press

    . pp. 278–279. ISBN 978-0-19-991143-1. Costing $15 million to produce, the film earned $47 million by the end of 1961 and $90 million worldwide by January 1989.

73. ↑Reid, John Howard (2006). . Volume 14 of Hollywood classics.

    Lulu

    . p. 243–245. ISBN 978-1-4116-7877-4. Negative cost: around $4 million; Worldwide film rentals gross (including 1968 American reissue) to 1970: $30 million.

74. ↑Webster, Patrick (2010). .

    McFarland & Company

    . pp. 298 (note 2.23). ISBN 978-0-7864-5916-2. cost $12 million and grossed some $60 million at the box office, figures Kubrick rarely again matched.

75. 204.0 204.1
    • : “In the case of , overseas earnings to 1969 amounted to $12,462,044, while U.S. and Canadian rentals (even including a million-dollar TV sale) were only $10,643,181. But the film failed to show a profit on production costs of $10,284,014 because of the distribution charges and expenses amounting to an additional $15,308,083.”
    • : ” (1966) was financed by the Italian producer Dino De Laurentiis from private investors and Swiss banks. He then sold distribution rights outside Italy jointly to Fox and Seven Arts for $15 million (70 percent of which came from Fox), thereby recouping the bulk of his $18 million investment. Although returned a respectable world rental of $25.3 million, Fox was still left with a net loss of just over $1.5 million. It was the last biblical epic to be released by any major Hollywood studio for nearly twenty years.”

    Hall & Neale 2010 , p. 179

76. ↑Block, Hayley Taylor (2010), , p. 449, With its three rereleases, it took in over $105 million in worldwide box office ($720 million in 2005 dollars).

    In:

    In: Block & Wilson 2010

77. 208.0 208.1 208.2 208.3 208.4 208.5 208.6
    • : “Domestic Rentals: $68.4; Foreign Rentals: $46.2; Production Cost: $8.0 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).”
    • : “Domestic Rentals: $20.1; Foreign Rentals: $11.2; Production Cost: $5.4 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).”
    • : “Domestic Rentals: $16.4; Foreign Rentals: $5.5; Production Cost: $10.3 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).”
    • : “Domestic Rentals: $22.1; Foreign Rentals: $18.2; Production Cost: $44.0 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).”
    • : “Domestic Rentals: $16.2; Foreign Rentals: $15.6; Production Cost: $7.0 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).”
    • : “Domestic Rentals: $13.9; Foreign Rentals: $19.3; Production Cost: $8.6 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).”
    • : “Domestic Rentals: $29.2; Foreign Rentals: $7.9; Production Cost: $6.6 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).”

    Block & Wilson 2010 , p. 434

78. ↑
    • 1962 release: “Lawrence of Arabia”. . Nash Information Services. LLC . Worldwide Box Office: $69,995,385; International Box Office: $32,500,000

    • U.S. total (including reissues): “Lawrence of Arabia”. . $44,824,852

79. 210.0 210.1 210.2166
    • : Columbia released the $13.8 million (1962), filmed in Super Panavision 70, exclusively on a hard-ticket basis, but opened (1962), (1963), and the $12 million Joseph Conrad adaptation (1965) as 70 mm roadshows in selected territories only.”
    • : “Darryl’s most ambitious independent production was (1962), a three-hour reconstruction of D-Day filmed in black-and-white CinemaScope at a cost of $8 million. It grossed over $30 million worldwide as a roadshow followed by general release, thereby helping the studio regain stability during its period of reorganization.”
    • : “With top tickets set at an all-time high of $5.50, had amassed as much as $20 million in such guarantees from exhibitors even before its premiere. Fox claimed the film had cost in total $44 million, of which $31,115,000 represented the direct negative cost and the rest distribution, print and advertising expenses. (These figures excluded the more than $5 million spent on the production’s abortive British shoot in 1960–61, prior to its relocation to Italy.) By 1966 worldwide rentals had reached $38,042,000 including $23.5 million from the United States.”

    Hall & Neale 2010 , p. 165

80. ↑ cost $14,483,000; although it earned $35 million worldwide in just under three years, with ultimate domestic rentals totaling $20,932,883, high distribution costs severely limited its profitability.”Hall & Neale 2010 , p. 164 . “cost $14,483,000; although it earned $35 million worldwide in just under three years, with ultimate domestic rentals totaling $20,932,883, high distribution costs severely limited its profitability.”
81. 213.0 213.1Chapman, James (2007). .

    I.B. Tauris

    . ISBN 978-1-84511-515-9.

    • : “The American release of again followed on some six months after it had been shown in Britain. North American rentals of $9.9 million were an improvement on its predecessor, helped by a slightly wider release, though they were still only half the $19.5 million of foreign rentals… (Online copy at

      Google Books

      )”

    • : ” marked a return to the box-office heights of the Bond films of the mid-1960s. Its worldwide rentals were $45.7 million…”[]
    • : “These figures were surpassed by , which earned total worldwide rentals of $87.7 million, of which $33 million came from North America. (Online copy at

      Google Books

      )”

82. 214.0 214.1Balio, Tino (2009). .

    University of Wisconsin Press

    . p. 261. ISBN 978-0-299-23014-2.

    • : “The picture grossed twice as much as , both domestic and foreign—$12.5 million worldwide (Online copy at

      Google Books

      )”

    • : “Produced on a budget of around $3 million, grossed a phenomenal $46 million worldwide the first time around. (Online copy at

      Google Books

      )”

83. 215.0 215.1
    • : ” (1964) cost Warners $17 million to make, including a record $5.5 million just for the film rights to the Alan Jay Lerner and Frederick Loewe stage show and a million-dollar fee for star Audrey Hepburn. By 1967 it was reported to have grossed $55 million from roadshowing worldwide.”
    • : ” (1964), which cost $5.2 million, was neither a stage adaptation nor a roadshow. But by the end of its first release, it had grossed nearly $50 million worldwide.”

    Hall & Neale 2010 , p. 184

84. ↑Burns, Douglas (2010), , p. 469, In its initial run, garnered an astounding $44 million in worldwide rentals and became the company’s first Best Picture Oscar contender.

    In:

    In: Block & Wilson 2010

85. ↑Silverman, Stephen M (1988). . Secaucus, N.J.: L. Stuart. p. 325. ISBN 9780818404856.

86. ↑“Hawaii”. . Nash Information Services. LLC .

87. ↑ (1966)—filmed in widescreen and black-and-white, largely set in domestic interiors and with a cast of only four principal actors—amounted to $7,613,000, in part because stars Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton received up-front fees of $1 million and $750,000 respectively, against 10 percent of the gross apiece. (Their participation was presumably added to the budget).”Hall & Neale 2010 , p. 188 . “The negative cost of Warners’ adaptation of Edward Albee’s play(1966)—filmed in widescreen and black-and-white, largely set in domestic interiors and with a cast of only four principal actors—amounted to $7,613,000, in part because stars Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton received up-front fees of $1 million and $750,000 respectively, against 10 percent of the gross apiece. (Their participation was presumably added to the budget).”
88. ↑“Animals Portray Parts in Disney’s “Robin Hood

    “

    “. . October 18, 1970. Sec. G, p. 7. “The Jungle Book,” in it’s [] initial world-wide release, has grossed $23.8 million to date…

89. ↑“The Jungle Book”. . December 31, 1966 . It was filmed at a declared cost of $4 million over a 42-month period.

90. 224.0 224.1Denisoff, R. Serge; Romanowski, William D. (1991). . Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-0-88738-843-9.
    • : p. 167. “World net rental was estimated at more than $85 million by January 1971.”
    • : p. 236. “The film was produced for $6 million and Paramount reportedly spent another $3 million on promotion.”

91. 225.0 225.1
    • : ” eventually earned U.S. rentals of $44,090,729 on a production cost of $3.1 million to become the most lucrative non-roadshow picture (and independent release) to date.”
    • : “None of these films was roadshown in the United States; most were set in contemporary America or had a contemporary “take” on the past (the casting of genuine teenagers to play Romeo and Juliet, the urbane sophistication of the dialogue in , the antiauthoritarianism of and ); most were produced on modest or medium-sized budgets (as low as $450,000 for and no higher than $6,825,000 for ); and all grossed upward of $10 million domestically.”

    Hall & Neale 2010 , p. 191 –192

92. ↑Welles, Chris (September 7, 1970). “Behind the Silence at Columbia Pictures—No Moguls, No Minions, Just Profits”. . 3 (36). New York Media. pp. 42–47. While Columbia, battling Ray Stark over every dollar, did for around $8.8 million, a million or so over budget, Fox spent nearly $24 million on , more than twice the initial budget, and the film will thus have to gross three times as much to break even.

93. ↑
    • United States and Canada: “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid”. . $102,308,525

    • Outside North America:

      . 2008. p. 388. went on to be a huge hit—by the spring of 1970 it had taken in $46 million in North America and grossed another $50 million abroad.

94. ↑

    D’Alessandro, Anthony (July 15, 2002). “Top 50 worldwide grossers”. . p. 52, Paramount at 90 supplement.

95. ↑

    “

    ‘

    Love Story’ II: Ryan Redux?”. . 9. New York Media. 1976. p. 389. Bring those handkerchiefs out of retirement. … After all, the first movie made around $80 million worldwide.

96. ↑), with more than $100 million in unadjusted worldwide box office on its initial release. The soundtrack album was also a huge seller. The 1979 rerelease was not as successful, with the $3.8 million print and ad costs almost as high as the $4.3 million in worldwide rentals.”Block & Wilson 2010 , p. 549 . “Fiddler had the highest domestic box office of 1971 (it was second in worldwide box office after), with more than $100 million in unadjusted worldwide box office on its initial release. The soundtrack album was also a huge seller. The 1979 rerelease was not as successful, with the $3.8 million print and ad costs almost as high as the $4.3 million in worldwide rentals.”
97. 234.0 234.1 234.2 234.3 234.4 234.5
    • : “Domestic Rentals: $127.0; Foreign Rentals: $141.5; Production Cost: $13.0 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).”
    • : “Domestic Rentals: $85.6; Foreign Rentals: $42.0; Production Cost: $7.2 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).”
    • : “Domestic Rentals: $34.0; Foreign Rentals: $11.1; Production Cost: $9.0 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).”
    • : “Domestic Rentals: $56.0; Foreign Rentals: $21.1; Production Cost: $1.6 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s).”

    Block & Wilson 2010 , p. 527

98. ↑Jacobs, Diane (1980). .

    Dell Publishing

    . p. 115. ISBN 978-0-440-53382-5. The Godfather catapulted Coppola to overnight celebrity, earning three Academy Awards and a then record-breaking $142 million in worldwide sales.

99. ↑Stanley, Robert Henry; Steinberg, Charles Side (1976). . Hastings House. p. 76. ISBN 978-0-8038-4681-4. …further reflected by the phenomenal successes of , and . The latter film, which cost about $10 million to produce, has grossed over $110 million worldwide.

100. ↑

     “Big Rental Films of 1974”. . January 8, 1975. p. 24. U.S-Canada market only $66,3000,000

101. 241.0 241.1

     Pollock, Dale (May 9, 1979). “WB Adds To Its Record Collection”. . p. 1. “Towering Inferno” did $56,000,000 overseas in billings while “The Exorcist” toted up $46,000,000

102. ↑

     , 8, New York Media, 1975, … should outstrip another MCA hit, , which had world-wide revenues of $115 million. (Online copy at

     Google Books

     )

103. ↑ which earned over $48,650,000 in domestic rentals and about $40 million foreign.”Hall & Neale 2010 , pp. 206 –208. “The most successful entry in the disaster cycle was the $15 millionwhich earned over $48,650,000 in domestic rentals and about $40 million foreign.”
104. 249.0 249.1Kilday, Gregg (July 5, 1977). “Director of ‘Jaws II’ Abandons His ‘Ship

     ‘

     “. . p. 6B.

105. ↑Priggé, Steven (2004). .

     McFarland & Company

     . p. 8. ISBN 978-0-7864-1929-6. The budget for the first was $4 million and the picture wound up costing $9 million.

106. ↑ was the “sleeper of the decade”. Produced by UA and costing just under $1 million, it went on to earn a box-office gross of $117,235,247 in the United States and $225 million worldwide.”Hall & Neale 2010 , p. 214 . “was the “sleeper of the decade”. Produced by UA and costing just under $1 million, it went on to earn a box-office gross of $117,235,247 in the United States and $225 million worldwide.”
107. 254.0 254.1 254.2 254.3Wuntch, Philip (July 19, 1985). “Return of E.T.” . Its worldwide box-office gross was $619 million, toppling the record of $530 million set by Star Wars.

108. ↑ was previewed at the Northpoint Theatre in San Francisco on May 1, 1977.”Hall & Neale 2010 , p. 218 . “Eventually costing $11,293,151,was previewed at the Northpoint Theatre in San Francisco on May 1, 1977.”
109. ↑Hofler, Robert (2010). . ReadHowYouWant.com. p. 145. ISBN 978-1-4596-0007-2. Despite the fact that Grease was well on its way to becoming the highest-grossing movie musical in the world, and eventually grossed over $341 million…

110. 259.0 259.1
     • . 72.

       Babson-United, Inc.

       1980. p. 262. Columbia Pictures Industries is continuing to rake in the box office dollars from its Oscar-winning , which has topped $100 million in domestic grosses and $70 million overseas. , which cost less than $8 million to make, is now the second…

     • Prince, Stephen (2002). .

       University of California Press

       . p. 7. ISBN 978-0-520-23266-2. Much of this was attributable to the performance of its hit film, ($94 million worldwide and the number two film in the domestic market).

111. 266.0 266.1, which grossed over $664 million in worldwide box office on initial release.”Block & Wilson 2010 , p. 609 . “Steven Spielberg, by far the most successful director of the decade, had the highest-grossing movie with 1982’s, which grossed over $664 million in worldwide box office on initial release.”
112. ↑ (which had cost only slightly over $10 million) and $150 million in 1985, mainly due to another Spielberg production, the $22 million Back to the Future, which became the top box office hit of the year.”Finler 2003 , p. 268 . “The studio had a record operating income of $212 million in 1982, the year of Spielberg’s(which had cost only slightly over $10 million) and $150 million in 1985, mainly due to another Spielberg production, the $22 million Back to the Future, which became the top box office hit of the year.”
113. ↑McAdams, Frank (2010), , pp. 678–679, Production Cost: $19.0 (Millions of $s) … Despite mixed reviews, it played in the top 10 for an extended period and was a huge hit, grossing almost $345 million in worldwide box office.

     In:

     In: Block & Wilson 2010

114. ↑
     • “Fatal Attraction”. .

     • Scott, Vernon (June 15, 1990). “

       ‘

       Three Men and Baby’ Sequel Adds Cazenove to Original Cast”. . New York. Hollywood (UPI). p. 9 (TV Plus – The Daily Gazette Supplement). That legacy is the $167,780,960 domestic box-office and $75 million foreign gross achieved by the original…

115. ↑

     Thomas, Bob

     (August 1, 1963). “Movie Finances Are No Longer Hidden From Scrutiny”. . Associated Press. p. 10.

116. ↑

     . 231. 1973. p. 2. As of the end of 1971, GWTW stood as the all-time money-drawing movie, with a take of $116 million, and, with this year’s reissues, it should continue to run ahead of the second place contender and all-time spectacle.

117. ↑

     . 2. 1974. Coppola is King Midas, the most individually powerful U.S. filmmaker .” His credits include directing the first (worldwide earnings: $142 million, ahead of , and )…(Online copy at

     Google Books

     )

[Update] เตรียมมันส์เฟร่อไปกับ 8 หนังเด็ด 4DX แห่งปี 2016 ครบทุกมิติความมันส์-หนังยักษ์มาเพียบ | กัปตันอเมริกา คริสโตเฟอร์ จอร์จ ซาร์ริส – Australia.xemloibaihat

‘เซน เมจกา’ บินสัมภาษณ์พิเศษ ‘เบนเนดิกต์ คัมเบอร์แบตช์’ ฮีโร่จากหนัง ‘Doctor Strange’

ชมวิดีโอด้านล่าง

‘เบนเนดิกต์ คัมเบอร์แบตช์’ นักแสดงหนุ่มผู้รับบทเป็น ดร.สตีเฟ่น สเตรนจ์ ฮีโร่จอมเวทย์จากค่าย Marvel จากภาพยนตร์ ‘Doctor Strange’ ให้สัมภาษณ์พิเศษกับเซน เมจกา ทีมข่าวเรื่องเล่าเช้านี้ที่ฮ่องกง ถึงคาแรกเตอร์ของตัวละคร ดร.สเตรนจ์ ที่เป็นที่พูดถึงว่าแปลกแหวกแนวจากฮีโร่ที่ผ่านๆ มาของมาเวล ชี้ถ้ามีพลังเหมือน ดร.สเตรนจ์ อยากพาตัวเองกลับบ้านไปอยู่กับครอบครัว เพราะไม่มีที่ไหนดีกว่าที่บ้านแล้ว ก่อนกล่าวปิดท้ายการสัมภาษณ์สุดพิเศษนี้เป็นภาษาไทยว่า \”สวัสดีครับ แฟนๆ ชาวไทย\”
รายละเอียดเพิ่มเติม http://morningnews.bectero.com/entertainment/27Oct2016/90064

เรื่องเล่าเช้านี้ (Morning News) 27 ตุลาคม 2559
ติดตามความเคลื่อนไหวข่าวสารได้ก่อนใครได้ที่นี่
เรื่องเล่าเช้านี้.com : http://morningnews.bectero.com
facebook : https://www.facebook.com/MorningNewsTV3
Twitter : https://twitter.com/MorningNewsTV3
Official LINE : @ruenglao

นอกจากการดูบทความนี้แล้ว คุณยังสามารถดูข้อมูลที่เป็นประโยชน์อื่นๆ อีกมากมายที่เราให้ไว้ที่นี่: ดูเพิ่มเติม

ดาวน์โหลดรูปภาพที่นี่

ทีมยอดเยี่ยมประจำสัปดาห์ ของพรีเมียร์ลีก [นัดที่ 18 แข่งน้อย…แต่แข่งนะ]

ชมวิดีโอด้านล่าง

ติดตามข่าวสารวงการฟุตบอลทั่วโลกได้ที่ช่อง Ballondor 2017
อย่าลืมกด Subscribe ช่องเพื่อเป็นกำลังใจให้ผมด้วยนะครับ ^^
หรือติดตามเพิ่มเติมได้ที่ Facebook Page ของพวกเรา
https://www.facebook.com/ballondor2017/

ดาวน์โหลดรูปภาพที่นี่

เปรียบเทียบ EP.7 captain america ( คริส อีแวนส์ ) ตอนเด็กและตอนโต

ชมวิดีโอด้านล่าง

เปรียบเทียบ EP.7 captain america ( คริส อีแวนส์ ) ตอนเด็กและตอนโต.\r
\r
เปรียบเทียบ EP.5 ฝรั่งขี้แกล้ง MY MATE NATE ตอนเด็กกับตอนโต.\r
\r
\r
\r
เปรียบเทียบ EP.4 พี่ Bie the Ska ตอนโต กับ ตอนเด็ก.\r
\r
เปรียบเทียบ EP.6 ประยุทธ์จันทร์โอชาตอนเด็กและตอนโต.

ดาวน์โหลดรูปภาพที่นี่

ซิตี้จ่าฝูง ทิ้งห่าง 6 แต้ม ไฮไลท์พรีเมียร์ลีกวัน บ็อกซิ่งเดย์ | TNNสปอร์ต

ชมวิดีโอด้านล่าง

ช่องทางติดตามสถานีข่าว TNN ช่อง16
https://www.tnnthailand.com
https://tv.trueid.net/live/tnn16
https://www.youtube.com/c/tnn16
https://www.facebook.com/TNNthailand/
https://www.facebook.com/TNN16LIVE/
https://twitter.com/tnnthailand
https://www.instagram.com/tnn_online/
https://www.tiktok.com/@tnnonline
Line @TNNONLINE หรือคลิก https://lin.ee/4fP2tltIo
ทันโลก ทันเศรษฐกิจ ทันทุกความจริง กับ TNNช่อง16 สถานีข่าวที่ถือหลักการของการนำเสนอข่าวตรงประเด็น รวดเร็ว ถูกต้อง แม่นยำ และเป็นกลาง โดยทีมข่าวมืออาชีพ

ดาวน์โหลดรูปภาพที่นี่

ไฮไลท์อเมริกันฟุตบอล NFL 2021 พิตต์สเบิร์ก สตีลเลอร์ส พบ แคนซัส ซิตี้ ชีฟส์

ชมวิดีโอด้านล่าง

ครบทุกความบันเทิงแบบเอชดี แพ็กดีที่สุด!! แพลทินัม หรือ โกลด์ แพ็กเกจ
สนใจสมัครทรูวิชั่นส์โทร. 027008000 l ทรูช้อป l ทรูพาร์ทเนอร์ หรือตัวแทนทรูวิชั่นส์ ทั่วประเทศ

ติดตามข่าวสารอัพเดทได้ที่:
Website: https://truevisions.co.th
Facebook Fan page: https://www.facebook.com/Truevisions
Twitter: https://twitter.com/truevisions
Instagram: http://instagram.com/truevisionsofficial
Line Official : https://lin.ee/1RdWmS1PZ
Tiktok : https://vt.tiktok.com/DuALfV/
สอบถามข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมโทร: 1242

ดาวน์โหลดรูปภาพที่นี่

นอกจากการดูบทความนี้แล้ว คุณยังสามารถดูข้อมูลที่เป็นประโยชน์อื่นๆ อีกมากมายที่เราให้ไว้ที่นี่: ดูบทความเพิ่มเติมในหมวดหมู่Wiki

ขอบคุณมากสำหรับการดูหัวข้อโพสต์ กัปตันอเมริกา คริสโตเฟอร์ จอร์จ ซาร์ริส